Rameau's Nephew: A Multi-Media Editionby D. Charlton

French Studies

Similar

Reason, Fools and Rameau's Nephew

Authors:
Nicholas Lash
1995

Multi-user navigation: A 3D mobile device interactive support

Authors:
Teddy Mantoro, Adamu Abubakar, Media A. Ayu
2011

DNA Methylation in Ovarian Cancer

Authors:
A. Ahluwalia, J.A. Hurteau, R.M. Bigsby, K.P. Nephew
2001

Immunomodulatory activity of resveratrol: discrepant in vitro and in vivo immunological effects

Authors:
Xiaohua Gao, Dorrah Deeb, Joseph Media, George Divine, Hao Jiang, Robert A Chapman, Subhash C Gautam
2003

Text

DENIS DIDEROT, Rameau’s Nephew: A Multi-Media Edition. Edited by MARIAN HOBSON.

Translated by KATE E. TUNSTALL and CAROLINE WARMAN. Music by the

Conservatoire national supe´rieur de musique de Paris, directed by PASCAL DUC.

Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2014. xxvi + 148 pp, ill., MP3 audio files.

At the heart of this extraordinary achievement is a superb new translation by Kate

E. Tunstall and Caroline Warman that catches on the wing, as it were, Diderot’s flights of fancy, using a new kind of verbal rhythm. Instead of seeming glued to the page, this

Nephew is encouraged to take convincing three-dimensional form, owning a fuller and more modern-sounding personality in English than he has hitherto been accorded. This is certainly apt, the translation showing how Diderot’s fusion of philosophy, pantomime, and plaidoyer sits ever more comfortably in a twenty-first century context. There is much elegance: great care was taken regarding layout, pages lightened by subtle spacing between certain paragraphs; notes are at the end, encouraging attention to be given to the ebb and flow of the conversation. Once consulted, the notes take on a life of their own: these are not so much the full-blown explanations that Marian Hobson provided in her French edition of Le Neveu (Geneva: Droz, 2013), but pithier formats that work together in a new way to bring the text alive. Here, numerous full-colour illustrations have been added, portraits, scenes, or facsimiles that lend an instant actuality. Physiognomy enters the argument, so that Diderot’s ad personam thrusts may be viscerally understood:

Satyre seconde was the preferred main title of Hobson’s French edition. For those who know what the Palais-Royal garden looks like, it still does good to see an eighteenthcentury ground-plan. All these benefits are available free of any charge or obligation to purchase, since Open Book Publishers make a complete facsimile of the book available to any reader who can access the relevant website. The guiding principle is collaboration.

Not just the visual but also the aural world of Diderot’s Nephew has been incorporated within the edition: pivotal references to music have been translated into performance and are keyed into the edition. They are activated electronically by using cues found in the text margins that are initially linked to music information within the sequence of notes at the end. One click, and the reader can listen through a computer or other device to, say, a Locatelli sonata or the Duni ariette to which Diderot is referring — or rather, which the Nephew is ‘performing’ after his own fashion. This is a finely ingenious conceit, not just a history lesson, because our technology becomes a metaphor for the process imagined by Diderot the writer as he urges the reader to replay Locatelli or Duni in the mind, to transpose that personal recording onto their imagined figure of the

Nephew; so the modern recordings take their place in a relay of imagined recordings dating back to the eighteenth century. In fact the internet provides a further extension of this, since these Diderot recordings are located on YouTube among yet other Locatelli or Duni recordings, immediately and profitably accessed and compared. (Unfortunately, some dreadful extracts taken from acted performances of ope´ras-comiques mentioned by

Diderot have also been posted on this site; they convey a wholly incorrect impression of amateurism and unmusicality.) This project, therefore, animates the provisionality of translation and of meaning, something that the semi-private nature of certain references within Le Neveu only serves to accentuate, never mind the episodic and narrative complexities of the primary text. Edition, translation, aural supplements — all should serve to engage and inspire a new generation of readers internationally, prompt comparisons (Sterne is one who comes to mind) and further efforts to understand what is, still, a demanding text. Those who prefer reading on screen will find navigation simple enough.

Or one can use screen and book simultaneously in order to explore illustrations and recordings. The latter have been created by Pascal Duc together with his early-music student groups at the Paris Conservatoire. Much work has been done in selecting and editing these pieces, then making them come alive. Not all performances are equally successful, but agreeable surprises are to be found: obscure as well as famous names on the

REVIEWS246 at K arolinska Institutet on M ay 31, 2015 http://fs.oxfordjournals.org/

D ow nloaded from page have been helped to voice the creative successes that earned them a mention in

Diderot’s argument in the first place.

DAVID CHARLTON

ROYAL HOLLOWAY, UNIVERSITY OF LONDONdoi:10.1093/fs/knv007

L’Affreuse doctrine: mate´rialisme et crise des mœurs au temps de Diderot. Par FRANCK SALAU¨N.

Avec la collaboration de CLAUDETTE FORTUNY. (Philosophie, e´piste´mologie.)

Paris: Kime´, 2014. 456 pp.

Dix-huit ans apre`s avoir publie´ sa the`se de doctorat sous le titre L’Ordre des mœurs: essai sur la place du mate´rialisme dans la socie´te´ franc¸aise du dix-huitie`me sie`cle (1734–1784), Franck

Salau¨n nous livre chez le meˆme e´diteur une version remanie´e du meˆme ouvrage. Le titre a change´ cependant: il insiste a` pre´sent plus fortement sur l’analyse des controverses qui entoure le mate´rialisme des Lumie`res. Les deux seules rubriques nouvelles de l’ouvrage se situent dans la quatrie`me et dernie`re partie (‘Re´ge´ne´ration et culture de soi’). La premie`re, qui cloˆt le chapitre 11, s’inte´resse aux de´bats sur ‘l’utilite´ du clerge´’, et la seconde, qui ache`ve le chapitre 12 et l’ouvrage, aux de´bats sur ‘qu’est-ce qu’un livre ne´cessaire?’

Revenons sur ces deux nouveaute´s. Le de´bat sur ‘l’utilite´ du clerge´’ est aborde´ principalement sous l’angle de la critique du ce´libat en lien avec la question de la population. Il affermit l’ide´e que la notion d’utilite´ est de plus en plus importante dans la querelle sur les mœurs au dix-huitie`me sie`cle. La dernie`re rubrique du dernier chapitre de l’ouvrage consiste quant a` elle en une longue analyse des positions de Malesherbes a` l’e´gard de l’opinion publique et de la censure. Cette analyse conduit Salau¨n a` une the`se d’ordre ge´ne´ral, dont on peut imaginer les implications ide´ologiques: il n’y a pas d’opinion publique, mais ‘la pression irre´gulie`re d’individus organise´s en publics, et de publics convergeant en forces sociales’ (p. 349). Parmi les ajouts de cette nouvelle version de l’ouvrage, on peut noter aussi l’insertion d’une e´tude succincte de Claudette Fortuny du parcours e´ditorial de la Lettre au R. P. Berthier sur le mate´rialisme, en 1759 (quatre pages). C’est peut-eˆtre la courte Pre´face de cette seconde version qui retient le plus l’attention, passe´ les retouches ponctuelles. En quelques phrases, elle tente une mise en perspective de l’ouvrage, de ses enjeux et de son positionnement critique et intellectuel. Revenant sur la question des rapports entre les textes et les pratiques, Salau¨n cherche a` se distinguer de ses prestigieux devanciers, comme Daniel Mornet, Ju¨rgen Habermas ou encore